Google Updates Penguin Algorithm

Last Friday Google confirmed the fourth major update of its Penguin algorithm, “Penguin 4.0”. The news comes nearly two years after the previous update, Penguin 3.0, which on release in late October 2014 affected around 1% of UK/US search results.

Alongside the update Google has announced that Penguin is now part of its core algorithm, effectively meaning that Penguin 4.0 is the last update webmasters will see.

What is Penguin?

First launched in April 2012, Penguin is designed to stop websites seen to be using “spammy” techniques from appearing in Google’s search results. The algorithm looks to identify and penalise sites using “bad links”, which have been bought or acquired in an attempt to boost ranking positions.

Sites caught out by Penguin typically see a sharp drop in ranking positions, with recovery only a possibility after a number of steps have been taken to remove links seen as toxic.

Even after these steps have been taken, a site might not see recovery until the next refresh of the Penguin algorithm. As Penguin has traditionally been refreshed manually, many site owners have faced a long wait for improvements to be seen.

However, with Penguin 4.0 come two important changes.

Penguin 4.0 runs in real time

As part of the core algorithm, Google has said that Penguin will now run on a real time basis, in contrast to the manual refreshes typical of previous updates. This means that if a site is affected by the algorithm, and efforts are made to rectify any issues, then recovery of rankings should take place fairly quickly; basically, as soon as a site is re-crawled and re-indexed.

As Penguin is effectively now running constantly, Google’s Gary Illyes has stated that the company is “not going to comment on future refreshes”. Although not the end of Penguin, this marks the end of the algorithm as most webmasters have come to know it.

Penguin 4.0 is granular

Previously, the Penguin algorithm affected sites in a blanket way; even if only one page had one “bad link”, the whole site could be penalised.

Now, Google has said that Penguin “devalues spam by adjusting ranking based on spam signals, rather than affecting ranking of the whole site”. Rather than a whole site being negatively affected, Penguin will now look to penalise on a page by page, or folder by folder basis. This means that whilst some pages, sections, or folders may receive penalties, others will not be affected.

Google has yet to confirm whether the Penguin 4.0 has been fully rolled out, with many predicting that the full update is likely to take place over a few weeks. Although webmasters could pre-empt any negative effects by performing a link detox, it’s positive for webmasters to know that any sites penalised will no longer face a long and frustrating road to recovery.

Social Media Roundup: August

There have been important updates for Facebook and its subsidiaries across August, which have wider implications for marketers and other businesses.

Facebook has branched into a new direction with its app that is aimed squarely at teenagers: Lifestage. Lifestage, currently only available in the US, is an app that relies heavily on user-generated video content and such videos are only visible to others at the same high school. Ironically, Lifestage replicates Facebook’s early days when it was used as an on-campus social networking service. Facebook has come under some criticism for not protecting vulnerable younger people. The app’s design, with lots of ephemeral video content, can be seen as a move against Snapchat and their current social media dominance over teens. Facebook is gradually falling in popularity with teen users, especially as more of their parents (and grandparents) move on to the app, therefore Facebook-owned Lifestage is an antidote to this trend. However, how well younger uses will take to the app instead of Snapchat remains to be seen.

Another of Facebook’s subsidiaries is also taking on the Snapchat market, this month Instagram has launched Instagram Stories. This in-app feature allows users to post pictures that will disappear after 24 hours, thus not appearing on (or interfering with) their perfectly-curated home feed. As Instagram stated in their introductory blog, “you don’t have to worry about overposting”. Users can edit their Instagram Stories with Emojis and their own drawing edits. Instagram Stories allows brands a major opportunity to create exciting video and image content that has a more authentic and ‘live’ feeling than a regular Instagram post. Brands will not have to worry about negative comments or responses, as this feature has been disabled on Stories. Particularly, businesses would be wise to be an early adopter of the Instagram Story, and post engaging ‘behind the scenes’ content which further humanises the brand.

In an attempt to reverse long-term trends of user growth stagnation, Twitter has introduced greater user controls over their own notifications. Users are able to select to receive notification from people they follow. This will help remove spam notifications that many users find an irritant. Other changes include adding a ‘quality filter’ to users’ home feeds. The algorithm behind this change will theoretically remove ‘spam’ tweets, which include automated tweets, repeated content, and account origin. Users that turn on this feature will see more content from accounts that they have previously interacted with and only people the user follows. Businesses and brands would be wise to keep posting varied content, as this algorithm could reduce reach if it deems content too similar and filters it from users’ feeds.

SEO Market Updates: August 2016

Google Updates Local Pack Algorithm

Google’s local pack results algorithm has had a big update as of last week, and various SEO forums have lit up with webmasters detailing the various changes to rankings they have noticed, with some saying this update is the biggest change to local rankings in a long time.

The update is thought to mostly be the spam algorithm refreshed, with new results appearing for certain terms for the first time in years, while other pages are suspended. These findings indicate that the update is either a core local ranking change, or a clean-up of the spam in the local index. Either way, spam is no longer ranking as well in local.

Google hasn’t commented on the changes.

New Mobile Penalty Arriving Early 2017

Google have announced that they will be clamping down on “intrusive” interstitials on mobile devices which impede their users’ browsing experiences. The new algorithm will launch in January 2017 with the aim of making pages running certain interstitials “not rank as highly” as previously. Google advised that the following would be affected:

  • Sites using pop ups that cover the main content, whether it’s immediately after accessing the page, or while browsing it.
  • Sites displaying an interstitial which users have to dismiss before accessing the page’s content.
  • Sites that use layouts where the above-the-fold portion of the page appears similar to a standalone interstitial, but the original content has been inlined underneath the fold.

Google has also advised that the following would not be penalised, if used responsibly:

  • Interstitials that appear due to a legal obligation, for example for cookie usage or age verification.
  • Login boxes on websites where content is not publicly accessible. For example, this would include private content such as email or unindexable content hidden behind a paywall.
  • Banners that use a reasonable amount of screen space and are easily dismissible.

Google to Drop Mobile Friendly Label

Google announced on the 23rd of August that they will be axing the ‘mobile friendly’ label from mobile search results. It’s important not to confuse this with the idea that Google are scrapping the mobile friendly ranking factor/signal – that remains as important as ever. Instead, Google is simply removing the indicator on search results which tells readers whether a site will load well on mobile, and the change is thought to be mostly cosmetic.

Additionally, Google have commented that “85% of all pages in the mobile search results now meet this criteria and show the mobile-friendly label”, indicating there is no longer a great benefit to the label.